Exercise: Correction

I have a Canon 5D full frame that I bought in 2007 and still use, but it  doesn’t have a dust cleaner built in and it seems to suck in dust with every stretch of a zoom lens, so its photos often show dust spots such as those below. The dust is most apparent on light coloured areas, particularly in the sly, but they are simple to remove. I use Photoshop  CS4 which is an older version and doesn’t have the latest software dust removers, but it works using a combination of the cloning tool and the spot healing brush.


Original dusty dull image

Final image with dust removed

Final image with dust removed

CORRECTION_dust spots1_MG_8247

Magnified to show dust spots

Lens flare is a different beast altogether, which I usually capture deliberately for an effect, or just delete any affected photos. However, for the purposes of this exercise I used a snap of the Natural History Museum at night and attacked the flare in the left side of the frame with a combination of clone stamp modes. That wouldn’t stand up to closer examination, so I achieved a better result by cropping the flare out completely. That isn’t the required solution here but I tend not to capture flare accidentally.


Original, with flare on the upper left side

Cloned out using colour, darken, lighten and normal modes.

Cloned out using colour, darken, lighten and normal modes.


A complete crop out

Q. How justifiable do you think this exercise was?
A. Dust and flare are imperfections within the camera and not what you might see in the scene so why would there be any objections to removing them? There may be times when you want to use the dust to illustrate how dusty the scene was, although you’d need your viewer to be au fait with camera imperfections, and you may want to use to use flare as an effect. One may still buy filters that cause a starburst effect similar to flare so it must be a popular effect for some people.

About watlvry

Flaneur for my own ailments; government and corporate hypocrisy; guitar stuff; the music business; home made videos featuring home made tunes played at home; a bit of golf; and of course photography. Specifically "art" photography (doesn't exist) and contemporary photography ( sadly does exist in all its grotesque reality).
Gallery | This entry was posted in Part 4: Reality and invention, Project: Digital Photography and truth. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s